Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Hands-On therapy showdown: which technique eases pelvic joint pain best?

NCT ID NCT07310368

Symptom relief Sponsor: Kirsehir Ahi Evran Universitesi Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Aug 13, 2026 · Updated 3 times

Summary

This study tested two manual therapy methods—myofascial release and joint mobilization—in 42 women with sacroiliac joint dysfunction, a common cause of low back pain. Both techniques were added to a standard exercise and ultrasound program over six weeks. Researchers measured pain, balance, spinal mobility, and disability to see which approach works better.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
manual therapy (myofascial release and joint mobilization)
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show which manual therapy technique works best for reducing pain and improving mobility in people with sacroiliac joint dysfunction.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed trial with only 42 women, so results may not apply to everyone. The differences between techniques may be small or not clinically meaningful.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

47 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Jan 2026

Finished

Apr 2026

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 to 65 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria Individuals aged between 18 and 65 years. Clinical diagnosis of sacroiliac joint dysfunction according to the criteria of the International Association for the Study of Pain. Pain localized to the sacroiliac joint region, with or without radiation to the hip, groin, or lower extremities. Positive findings in at least three of five sacroiliac joint provocation tests: Vorlauf test, Gillet test, irritation point tenderness, posterior shear test, and compression test. Pain intensity of at least 3 on the Visual Analog Scale. Voluntary participation and provision of written informed consent. --Exclusion Criteria History of surgery involving the spine, pelvis, or lower extremities. Lumbar disc herniation, spinal stenosis, or acute hip joint pathology. Piriformis syndrome or low back or hip pain originating from a condition other than sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Central or peripheral neurological disease or progressive neurological deficit. Rheumatological disease, including rheumatoid arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis. Pregnancy or a severe systemic condition that could interfere with participation.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Sacroiliac joint dysfunction are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Sacroiliac joint dysfunction

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Kirşehir Ahi Evran University

    Center, Kirşehi̇r, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.