Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

AI outperforms traditional methods in predicting Post-Surgery bowel issues

NCT ID NCT07267767

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study looked at 3500 rectal cancer patients who had minimally invasive surgery to see if computer models could better predict a common side effect called Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS), which causes bowel control problems. Researchers tested seven different methods, including six machine learning techniques and one traditional statistical model, to find the most accurate predictor. The goal was to help doctors identify high-risk patients earlier and improve follow-up care.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

3,500 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Apr 2015

Finished

Jun 2024

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

This retrospective analysis included 3,937 radical rectal cancer cases from two Chinese university hospitals (Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital 2015-2023, n=2612; Jilin University's China-Japan Union Hospital 2021-2023, n=1325), with rigorous selection criteria ensuring cohort homogeneity

Ages

Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)

Sex

Anyone

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria:(1) rectal adenocarcinoma (2) minimally invasive sphincter-preserving surgery (taTME/ISR/LAR) (3) intact baseline anal function (4) no emergent presentations or metastases. \- Exclusion Criteria:emergent presentations or metastases \-

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Lars - low anterior resection syndrome are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.