Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Light against pain: laser and infrared go head to head in ACL rehab

NCT ID NCT07829835

NEW Symptom relief Sponsor: Superior University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Sep 21, 2026 · Last updated Sep 21, 2026

Summary

Researchers compare two light-based treatments, low-level laser therapy and infrared therapy, for people with a Grade II anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, a partial tear that causes knee pain and limits movement. Thirty participants aged 15 to 45 will be assigned to one of two groups. Both groups receive the same standard physiotherapy, including range-of-motion and strengthening exercises, five days a week for four weeks. One group also gets laser treatment and the other gets infrared treatment. The study measures changes in pain and in psychological readiness to return to activity.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
low-level laser therapy and infrared therapy, two light-based devices added to standard physiotherapy
What this could lead to
If one therapy helps more, physiotherapists could have a clearer choice for easing pain and rebuilding confidence during ACL rehab.
What could go wrong
This is a small, short study of 30 people over four weeks, so any difference between the two therapies may be modest or fade. Light therapy can cause minor skin warmth or irritation, and results may not apply to other ACL grades.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

30 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Apr 2026

Finished

Sep 2026

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

15 to 45 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: Participants aged 15-45 years. * Male and female participants. * Participants with Grade II ACL injury diagnosed through MRI as prescribed by an orthopedic surgeon or orthopedic physician. * MRI findings confirming a partial/Grade II ACL injury following orthopedic referral. * Positive results from ACL special tests, including the pivot-shift, anterior drawer, and Lachman tests. * Participants with MRI findings consistent with a partial or Grade II ACL injury and clinical symptoms suggestive of ACL instability. * Athletes participating in football, soccer, cricket, basketball, volleyball, badminton, or running. * OPD patients. Exclusion Criteria: * Fracture of the affected knee or associated lower-limb fracture. * Neurological or systemic disorders. * Participants who are not medically cleared for conservative physiotherapy rehabilitation.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acl-injury are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Acl-injury

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Enzee Clinic

    Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan

  • Lahore Poly Clinic

    Lahore, Pakistan

  • M. Ali Medical Center

    Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.