Robot help for Surgeons-in-Training: does it speed up learning?
NCT ID NCT02888158
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study tested whether surgical interns learn faster with robotic assistance during laparoscopic training. 34 interns were split into two groups: one trained with a standard pelvic trainer, the other with robotic help. They were then timed while performing a kidney surgery on a pig. The goal was to see which training method leads to quicker surgery.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If robotic assistance proves better, it could improve surgical training methods.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage study with only 34 participants, using an animal model, so results may not apply to real surgeries.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
34 people
The number who actually took part.
- Start date
-
Feb 2012
- Finished
-
Dec 2015
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Intern registered for specialization in surgery (urological, visceral or gynecology-obstetrics) Exclusion Criteria: * The intern refuses to participate in the study * The internal is not available for training and/or evaluation
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Surgical training are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
CHU de Montpellier - Hôpital Gui de Chauliac
Montpellier, 34295, France
-
CHU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau
Nîmes, 30029, France