Video laryngoscope vs. traditional tool: which is faster for new doctors?
NCT ID NCT07174050
First seen Nov 01, 2025 · Last updated May 17, 2026 · Updated 27 times
Summary
This study tested two devices used to place a breathing tube in adults having surgery. One device has a camera and a channel to guide the tube, while the other is a traditional tool that lets doctors look directly at the vocal cords. The goal was to see which device helped new doctors insert the tube faster and more successfully. The study involved 70 patients and was led by Hitit University.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for AIRWAY MANAGEMENT are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Locations
-
Izmir City Hospital
Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye)
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.