Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Bone injection for CT scans: tiny study tests safety

NCT ID NCT01531686

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early This study
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This observational study looked at whether CT contrast dye can be safely and effectively delivered through a needle placed in the upper arm bone (intraosseous access) instead of a vein. Only 8 adults who already had such access were enrolled. The study was terminated early, so the findings are very limited.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
CT contrast dye delivered via intraosseous access
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that injecting CT contrast dye through a bone (intraosseous) is a safe and effective option when IV access is not possible.
What could go wrong
This was a very small study (only 8 people) that was terminated early, so results are limited and may not apply broadly. The procedure carries risks like infection or dye leakage.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

8 people

The number who actually took part.

Start date

Mar 2012

Finished

Jan 2014

Lead sponsor

A company

The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

Adult patients who have received proximal humerus intraosseous vascular access as standard of care via the EZ-IO 45 mm needle set and require Computed Tomography (CT) examination

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Aged 18 years or older * Has received intraosseous (IO) vascular access at the proximal humerus insertion site via EZ-IO 45 mm needle set, as standard of care * Requires Computed Tomography (CT) examination with contrast media delivery via proximal humerus intraosseous catheter, as standard of care * Cognitively and physically able to give written consent to participate in the study or is obtained from a Legally Authorized Representative (LAR) Exclusion Criteria: * Fracture in target bone, or significant trauma to the site * Excessive tissue and/or absence of adequate anatomical landmarks in target bone * Infection in target area * IO insertion in past 24 hours, prosthetic limb or joint or other significant orthopedic procedure in target bone * Allergy to contrast media * Imprisoned * Pregnant * Requires English language translation other than Spanish * Has received proximal humerus IO access with an IO catheter other than the EZ-IO 45 millimeter (mm) needle set system * Has existing proximal humerus IO access using the EZ-IO 45 mm needle set but IO catheter is mal-positioned or dislodged

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Patients with intraosseous vascular access requiring computed tomography (CT) exam are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Grand Strand Regional Medical

    Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29572, United States

  • Maricopa Medical Center

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85008, United States

  • Olive View UCLA Medical Center

    Sylmar, California, 91342, United States

  • Shands Critical Care Center and Cancer Hospital

    Gainesville, Florida, 32608, United States