Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Which position is safer for breathing tube placement in neck mass patients?

NCT ID NCT07507032

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study looked at 108 adults with neck masses who needed a breathing tube for surgery. Researchers compared placing the tube while the person lay on their back versus on their side, using different types of laryngoscopes. The main goal was to see which position and tool allowed faster and safer tube placement.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

108 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Mar 2025

Finished

Jan 2026

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

* Before randomization, we will record morphometric characteristics including the Mallampati score, mouth opening (inter-incisor distance in centimeters), and thyromental distance (with the head extended in upright position, in centimeters). * Prediction of difficult intubation using Wilson score

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with different neck masses undergoing thyroid and non-thyroid surgeries. * Both genders. * Patients \> 18 years old. * with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with spine deformities limiting lying supine or lateral. * age under 18 years. * with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status III or IV

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Endotracheal intubation risk assessment are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Aswan faculty of medicine

    Aswān, 81111, Egypt