Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Study comparing bone vs vein drug delivery for emergency intubation pulled before starting

NCT ID NCT01634867

Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Vidacare Corporation Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled This study
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This pilot study aimed to compare giving muscle-relaxing drugs through a vein versus through a bone (intraosseous) in children needing emergency breathing tubes. The goal was to see which method was faster and easier. However, the study was withdrawn before enrolling any participants, so no results are available.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Start date

Sep 2012

Finished

Aug 2014

Lead sponsor

A company

The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

patients in the emergency department with airway difficulties requiring rapid sequence intubation.

Ages

Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * subjects requiring rapid sequence intubation for whom rocuronium is chosen as the paralytic agent. * the operator chooses to place a peripheral intravenous or powered intraosseous catheter to permit rapid sequence intubation. Exclusion Criteria: * subjects in whom vascular access for rapid sequence intubation drug administration was established prior to arrival to the emergency department.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Airway control are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Airway control

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Omaha Children's Hospital and Medical Center

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68198, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.