Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Digital dental scans may beat goopy impressions for speed and comfort

NCT ID NCT07705009

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jul 15, 2026 · Last updated Jul 16, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial compares two ways of taking dental impressions: the traditional method using alginate (a goopy material) and digital scanning with two different intraoral scanners. The study involves 171 dental students aged 18 to 24, who are randomly assigned to one of the three techniques. Researchers measure how long each procedure takes and ask participants about their comfort, nausea, pain, and overall satisfaction right after the impression is made.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
intraoral scanning (TRIOS 3 and Medit i700) compared with conventional alginate impressions
What this could lead to
If digital scanning proves faster and more comfortable, it could become the preferred method for dental impressions in young adults.
What could go wrong
This is a small, single-center study in healthy dental students, so results may not apply to older patients or those with complex dental conditions.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

171 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

May 2025

Finished

Aug 2025

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 to 24 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Undergraduate dental students at the University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University. * Aged 18 to 24 years. * Willing to undergo one maxillary and one mandibular dental impression using the assigned technique. * Willing and able to complete the study questionnaire. * Provided written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * Currently undergoing orthodontic treatment. * Presence of a systemic disease or acute condition that limited the ability to cooperate or increased the risk of discomfort during impression taking or intraoral scanning, including an acute respiratory disorder or frequent vomiting. * Limited mouth opening or an oral and maxillofacial condition that prevented correct impression-tray seating or scanner-tip placement according to the study protocol. * A maxillofacial abnormality that markedly affected the procedure or caused significant recording distortion. * An excessive gag reflex that prevented completion of the assigned procedure.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Dental impression techniques are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Faculty of Odonto-Stomatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University

    Huế, 530000, Vietnam

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.