Denture showdown: which attachment keeps your jawbone healthier?
NCT ID NCT07241481
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This completed study tested two types of attachments (ball-and-socket vs Equator) for lower jaw implant-supported dentures in 24 adults aged 55-60. Researchers measured bone loss around the implants and how bite forces were distributed. The goal was to see which attachment provides better stability and preserves jawbone health.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Ball-and-socket attachment and Equator attachment (dental implant components)
- What this could lead to
- If one attachment proves better, it could improve denture stability and comfort for people with missing lower teeth.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed trial with only 24 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The study compares two existing options, not a new breakthrough.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
24 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jul 2024
- Finished
-
Dec 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
55 to 60 years
- Sex
-
Male participants only
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * All patients age must range from 55- 60 years old. * All patients' ridges should be covered with firm mucosa free from any signs of inflammation or ulceration and exhibit adequate height and width of the residual alveolar ridge. * Patients should be free from any metabolic or bone disorder that contraindicate implant installation. * All patients must have sufficient inter arch space Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with oral or systemic diseases. 2. Patients with xerostomia or excessive salivation. 3. Patients with parafunctional habits (bruxism or clenching). 4. Heavy smoker or alcoholic patients. 5. Patients with history of temporo-mandibular dysfunction. 6. Patients with brain disorders or psychiatric disorders
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Attachments are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Oral and Dental Research Institute, National Research Center
Cairo, 4470351, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Your phone could map dental implants as well as a tablet
- Can leaving a sliver of tooth root save your smile after an implant?
- Can a tiny incision make dental implant surgery less painful?
- The tiny implant part that could save your jawbone
- Dental implant showdown: titanium vs nano-carbon frames
- Which dental framework keeps bacteria at bay?