Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Doctors worldwide vote to set fair rules for cancer patients in intensive care

NCT ID NCT07809490

Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Onco Critical Care Society Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting This study
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Sep 09, 2026 · Last updated Sep 10, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

Hospitals lack agreed rules for when a person with cancer should go to the intensive care unit (ICU) and when they are well enough to leave. This project brings together 30 to 40 cancer and critical care experts from around the world to vote on draft statements about ICU care. Through at least three rounds of anonymous online surveys, the panel aims to reach consensus on admission, triage, time-limited trials, and discharge criteria. The goal is to help doctors give ICU care when it can truly help and avoid treatment that cannot.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If experts agree, hospitals could use one shared set of rules to decide which cancer patients benefit from intensive care and when to step down, reducing both missed chances and futile treatment.
What could go wrong
The panel may fail to agree on key points, leaving doctors without clear guidance. Even a strong consensus may not fit every hospital or patient, and the rules will need regular review as care changes.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

About 40 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Expected to start

Aug 2026

An estimate. Start dates often move.

Expected to finish

Dec 2026

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

40 delphi panelist

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: Aged 18 years or older Clinician, methodologist will be invited to serve as a voting panelist For clinicians: recognized specialist qualification in intensive care medicine, medical oncology, haematology (including haematopoietic cell transplantation or cellular therapy), palliative medicine, emergency medicine. For clinicians: at least five years of post-qualification practice involving critically ill adults with cancer Current professional base in one of the six WHO regions Able to complete online questionnaires in English Willing to participate in all planned Delphi rounds and to complete a conflict-of-interest declaration Provides informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Member of the Steering Committee or the study methodologist (non-voting roles) Unable to commit to the full sequence of Delphi rounds Declared conflict of interest that the Steering Committee judges incompatible with voting Second or subsequent nominee from a country already represented, where the one-panellist-per-co

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Cancer critically ill are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

neoplasm

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Cancer critically ill Cancer, critical care

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    The full official record for this study. This one lists no contact details, but it is the first place any would appear.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Max Super specialty Hospital Shalimar bagh

    New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110085, India