I-gel mask vs. standard tube: which is safer for short surgeries?
NCT ID NCT05782517
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compared two ways to help patients breathe during short gynecologic laparoscopic procedures: the I-gel laryngeal mask (a soft tube placed in the throat) and the standard endotracheal tube (a tube placed into the windpipe). Researchers measured air leaks, ease of placement, and side effects in 120 participants. The goal was to see if the I-gel mask is a safe and simpler alternative for surgeries lasting under two hours.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- I-gel laryngeal mask (supraglottic airway device) and endotracheal tube
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that the I-gel mask is a safer, easier alternative to standard intubation for short laparoscopic surgeries.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed study with 120 participants, so results may not apply to all patients or longer procedures. The comparison is about device performance, not a new treatment.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
120 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Oct 2023
- Finished
-
Oct 2024
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Female participants only
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * The expected duration of the procedure does not exceed 2 hours * Agreeing to participate in the study Exclusion Criteria: * The expected duration of the procedure is longer than 2 hours * The patient suffers from restricted mouth opening, trismus, recent oral trauma or oral abscesses * The patient has a BMI of more than 40 kg/m² * The patient is known to have gastroparesis or another risk factor that would prevent you from being sober during the procedure
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Intubation complication are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
UZ Brussel
Jette, Brussels Capital, 1090, Belgium
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Which breathing tube causes fewer throat injuries? new trial compares two designs
- Could a 'robotic cough' stop deadly pneumonia in ICU patients?
- New study tests safer dosing of Heart-Stabilizing drug during breathing tube insertion
- New device aims to prevent bedsores from breathing tubes
- Massive global study aims to make Kids' anesthesia safer
- Can a special toothbrush stop pneumonia in ICU patients?