Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Can a hybrid sling improve incontinence surgery outcomes?

NCT ID NCT07762300

Disease control Sponsor: Benha University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now This study
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Aug 13, 2026 · Last updated Aug 14, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial compares two surgical sling procedures for women with stress urinary incontinence (leakage during coughing, sneezing, or exercise). One uses a standard synthetic mesh sling, while the other uses a hybrid sling that combines a strip of the patient's own abdominal tissue with mesh. The study aims to see which approach is safer, more effective at stopping leaks, and better for sexual function.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
A hybrid sling combining a strip of the patient's own abdominal tissue (rectus fascia) with a synthetic polypropylene mesh, placed under the urethra to support it.
What this could lead to
If successful, this hybrid sling could offer a safer, more effective option for women with stress urinary incontinence, potentially reducing mesh-related complications while preserving sexual function.
What could go wrong
This is a relatively small, early-stage trial, and the hybrid sling involves a more invasive procedure (harvesting tissue) that may carry its own risks. Results may not generalize to all patients.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 90 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Jul 2026

Expected to finish

Mar 2027

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Female participants only

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Female patients suffering from genuine stress urinary incontinence. * Failed conservative management (pelvic floor exercises, medical therapy) * Written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * Mixed urinary incontinence with predominant urge component. * High-grade pelvic organ prolapse (POP-Q Stage \>= II), which required surgical intervention. * Neurogenic bladder or voiding dysfunction (Post-void residual \> 100 ml). * Coagulopathy or active urinary tract infection. * Patients who underwent recent pelvic radiotherapy. * Previous incontinence surgery (recurrent cases).

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Female sexual function are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

female stress incontinence Urinary Incontinence, Stress

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Female sexual function Hybrid sling Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) Transobturator tape

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Benha University Hospital

    RECRUITING

    Banhā, Qalyubia Governorate, 13511, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.