Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Could a simpler surgical locking method reduce nerve damage in broken arm bones?

NCT ID NCT05877014

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now This study
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jul 30, 2026 · Last updated Jul 31, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial tests whether locking a metal nail only on one side of a broken upper arm bone (unipolar interlocking) works as well as locking it on both sides (bipolar interlocking). The simpler technique may lower the risk of nerve injury, infection, and radiation exposure. About 390 adults with humeral shaft fractures who need surgery will be randomly assigned to one of the two methods and followed for a year to see if the bone heals properly.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
surgical technique: unipolar interlocking versus bipolar interlocking for intramedullary nailing
What this could lead to
If unipolar interlocking works as well as the standard technique, it could reduce nerve damage, infection, and radiation exposure during surgery.
What could go wrong
This is a single-center trial, and unipolar locking may lead to malunion requiring additional surgery. Results may not apply to all fracture types.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Phase 3

Large-scale testing in a bigger group. Usually the last step before a treatment can be approved.

Participants

About 390 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Jul 2023

Expected to finish

Sep 2027

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patient with written consent * Patient ≥18 years of age with a diagnosis of humeral shaft fracture (all types in the AO classification) requiring surgical treatment with intramedullary nailing Exclusion Criteria: * Person not affiliated to national health insurance * Patient unable to attend all study visits * Patient with a pathologic fracture * Patient with a post-traumatic brachial plexus injury at the time of inclusion * Patient under court protection, guardianship or legal guardianship * Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding woman * Patient admitted for revision surgery of a humerus fracture (insufficient healing or complication) * Patient with an acute or chronic, unstable or poorly controlled disease that may interfere with the evaluation of the study objective, as determined by the investigator.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Humeral shaft fracture are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Chu Dijon Bourgogne

    RECRUITING

    Dijon, 21000, France