Food prescription program aims to lower blood sugar in food-insecure diabetics
NCT ID NCT04725630
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested whether giving adults with type 2 diabetes and food insecurity a small weekly incentive ($10.50 per household member) to buy healthy foods could improve their blood sugar control. 597 participants were randomly assigned to receive either the food incentive plus a healthy food prescription pamphlet, or just the pamphlet alone. The main goal was to see if the incentive group had lower blood sugar levels (measured by hemoglobin A1C) after 12 months.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- healthy food incentive ($10.50/week/household member for 12 months)
- What this could lead to
- If it works, this could show that helping people afford healthy food improves blood sugar control and reduces diabetes complications.
- What could go wrong
- This is a completed study, but the intervention is small ($10.50/week) and may not be enough to make a lasting difference. Results may not apply to everyone with diabetes.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
597 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
May 2021
- Finished
-
Mar 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 85 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Adults (18-85 years) with type 2 diabetes (or diabetes of unknown etiology) * Persistent hyperglycemia (i.e. hemoglobin A1C 6.5-12%) * Are currently experiencing food insecurity and/or report that it is difficult/very difficult to make ends meet * Can communicate in English or have someone to translate Exclusion Criteria: * A1c \<6.5% or \> 12% given the recommendation for anti-hyperglycemic treatment escalation for those with A1c\>12% * Reside in a facility that provides meals (e.g., shelter, long-term care, prison) * Exhibit signs/symptoms of metabolic decompensation (weight loss, polyuria, polydipsia) * Diagnosis of eating disorder(s) (e.g., anorexia nervosa, bulimia) * Have experienced diabetic ketoacidosis or a hyperglycemic hyperosmolar emergency in the past year * Experienced a hypoglycemic event in the past 3 months * Are trying to conceive, pregnant and/or breastfeeding * Are currently participating in other clinical trials * A household member is currently or has previously participated in this trial * Unwilling/unable to shop in study-affiliated supermarkets for the next 12 months * Plan to leave for Canada for more than 2 weeks in the next 12 months * Unable to complete data collection at follow-up (e.g., due to moving)
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Diabetes complications are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Primary Care Clinics
Various Cities, Alberta, Canada
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a nurse and a neighbor help tame chronic disease?
- Which SGLT2 inhibitor wins? trial pits empagliflozin against dapagliflozin
- Can a vegan diet shield police officers from heart disease?
- Can a health coach in your patient portal help you lose weight?
- Common antibiotic may boost diabetes control
- Can continuous glucose monitors safely tighten hospital blood sugar control?