Ankle injury study compares screws and suture buttons for better walking recovery
NCT ID NCT04972578
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compared how well people walk after ankle syndesmosis repair using either screw fixation or a suture button device. Researchers measured step length, width, timing, and speed on a special mat. The trial was terminated early and enrolled only 21 adults with isolated rotational ankle injuries. Results may help guide surgical choices but are limited due to the small size and early stop.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Screw fixation or suture button device
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this study could help doctors choose the best surgical method for ankle syndesmosis injuries to improve walking recovery.
- What could go wrong
- The study was terminated early with only 21 participants, so results are limited and may not apply to all patients. No clear superiority was shown between the two methods.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
21 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Oct 2021
- Finished
-
Jan 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
19 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * 19 years of age and older * Isolated rotational ankle injury * Syndesmotic instability (determined either pre- or intra-operatively) * Length-stable fibula fracture pattern Exclusion Criteria: * Open fracture * Length-unstable fracture pattern (including Maisonneuve fracture pattern) * Syndesmotic stability (determined either pre- or intra-operatively) * Lower extremity neuropathy * History of prior trauma or surgery to injured ankle * Non-ambulatory * Use of ambulatory assistive device prior to injury
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute disruption of ankle syndesmosis are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Lauritzen Outpatient Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68105, United States
-
Nebraska Medicine, Bellevue Health Center
Bellevue, Nebraska, 68123, United States
-
Village Point Outpatient Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68118, United States