Sham surgery showdown: is the knife worth it for sciatica?
NCT ID NCT07418944
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tests whether a common back operation (microdiscectomy) actually relieves sciatica leg pain better than a pretend surgery. 122 adults with a herniated disc and persistent leg pain will be randomly assigned to get either the real operation or a sham procedure. Neither the patient nor their regular doctors will know which they received, giving us clear evidence on whether the surgery truly helps.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 122 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Feb 2026
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2030
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 60 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Age 18-60 years * Diagnosed unilateral lower extremity radiculopathy (sciatica) secondary to lumbar disc herniation (LDH) * Single LDH at the level of L3/4, L4/5 or L5/S1 on magnetic resonance imaging * Symptom duration minimum 6 weeks * NRS worst leg pain 5 or higher * Patient has not responded to at least one form of non-operative care * Patient willing to undergo surgery * Patient willing and able to give consent and comply with study procedures * Sufficient proficiency in the language of the study site to provide informed consent and comply with study procedures Exclusion Criteria: * Doubtful nerve root compression * Spinal stenosis or any other confounding spinal condition * Far lateral disc herniation * Serious neurological deficit * Previous spinal surgery * Any contraindication to MRI * BMI \> 35 or lumbar subcutaneous fat \> 50 mm as determined from the MRI * ASA classification \> 2 * Being pregnant
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Helsinki University Central Hospital
RECRUITINGHelsinki, Finland
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Zapping nerves without a scalpel: can radiofrequency quiet chronic pain?
- Arabic back pain survey put to the test
- Can adding dextrose or saline boost pain injection relief?
- Can one injection beat back pain? a trial aims to find out
- Can a simple tape boost sciatica recovery and balance?
- Nerve flossing for athletes: a simple technique that could keep hamstrings strong?