Essure vs. laparoscopic sterilization: which has fewer side effects?
NCT ID NCT03127722
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study followed 990 women who chose either Essure or laparoscopic sterilization to compare rates of pain, abnormal bleeding, allergic reactions, and the need for further surgery. Researchers collected blood samples and tracked health outcomes over time. The goal was to better understand the risks of each procedure, not to test a new treatment.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
990 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
May 2017
- Finished
-
Dec 2024
- Lead sponsor
-
A company
The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
21 years and older
- Sex
-
Female participants only
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Subjects who are at least 21 years of age; * Subjects of all weights will be included; * Subjects who are scheduled to undergo an Essure insert placement procedure for permanent birth control or laparoscopic tubal sterilization. Decision for either treatment based upon clinical practice and physician/patient counseling. * For the Essure group only: • Subjects selecting hysteroscopic sterilization who are not contraindicated for the Essure procedure according to the most current approved version of the Essure IFU; * For the laparoscopic tubal sterilization group only: * Subjects selecting laparoscopic sterilization who are not contraindicated for laparoscopic tubal sterilization according to common clinical practice standard of care. Exclusion Criteria: * Subjects who are post-menopausal; * Subjects suspected of being or confirmed pregnant; * Subjects post-partum or undergone pregnancy termination ≤6 weeks prior to scheduled procedure; * Subjects uncertain about ending fertility; * Subjects with an active upper or lower genital tract infection; * Subjects with gynecologic malignancy (suspected or known); * Subjects who have had an attempted prior sterilization procedure (either laparoscopic or hysteroscopic); * Subjects scheduled to undergo concomitant intrauterine or laparoscopic procedures at the time of insert placement (intrauterine device removal is not considered a concomitant procedure) or laparoscopic sterilization; * Subjects with unexplained vaginal bleeding.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Contraception are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
AC Clinical Research
Tiffin, Ohio, 44883-2820, United States
-
Altus Research
Lake Worth, Florida, 33461, United States
-
Amy Brenner, MD & Associates, LLC
Mason, Ohio, 45040, United States
-
Baptist Health Center for Clinical Research
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205-6325, United States
-
Ben Taub General Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
-
Brown Stone Clinical Trials, LLC
Irving, Texas, 75061, United States
-
Clinical Research Prime, LLLP
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83402-3344, United States
-
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032, United States
-
Columbus OB-GYN/Radiant Research
Columbus, Ohio, 43213, United States
-
Complete Healthcare for Women, Inc.
Columbus, Ohio, 43231, United States
-
Eclipse Clinical Research
Tucson, Arizona, 85745-2696, United States
-
HWC Women's Research Center
Englewood, Ohio, 45322, United States
-
HillTop Obstetrics & Gynecology
Franklin, Ohio, 45005-2593, United States
-
Horizon Research Group of Opelousas, LLC
Eunice, Louisiana, 70535, United States
-
IU Health University Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
-
Jersey Shore University Medical Center
Neptune City, New Jersey, 07753, United States
-
John H Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
-
M & O Clinical Research, LLC
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33316, United States
-
MetroHealth Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44109-1998, United States
-
Mid-Atlantic Permanente Research Institute
Rockville, Maryland, 20852, United States
-
New Horizons Women's Care
Chandler, Arizona, 85224, United States
-
OB-GYN Centre of Excellence
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37404, United States
-
Office of Dr. Cindy Basinski, LLC
Newburgh, Indiana, 47630, United States
-
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
-
Oklahoma University
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104, United States
-
Orange Coast Women's Medical Group - Laguna Hills Office
Laguna Hills, California, 92653, United States
-
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
-
Palmetto Clinical Research (PCR)
Charleston, South Carolina, 29406-9126, United States
-
Physician Care Clinical Research
Sarasota, Florida, 34239, United States
-
Physicians Research Options, LLC
Lakewood, Colorado, 80228, United States
-
Precision Trials, AZ, LLC
Phoenix, Arizona, 85032, United States
-
Reading Hospital
West Reading, Pennsylvania, 19611, United States
-
Seven Hills Women's Health Centers
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242, United States
-
Southeast Texas Family Planning and Cancer Screening
Houston, Texas, 77074, United States
-
St. Luke's Hospital - Allentown Campus
Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18104-9701, United States
-
Tanner Clinic
Layton, Utah, 84041-8803, United States
-
The Iowa Clinic, PC
West Des Moines, Iowa, 50266-8289, United States
-
The Woman's Hospital of Texas
Houston, Texas, 77054, United States
-
The Women's Health Group, P.C.
Thornton, Colorado, 80229-4388, United States
-
Tidewater Clinical Research, Inc.
Virginia Beach, Virginia, 23456, United States
-
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111, United States
-
Unified Women's Clinical Research
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103-1749, United States
-
Unified Women's Clinical Research, LLC
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27401-1207, United States
-
United Clinical Research
Huntington Beach, California, 90255, United States
-
Universal Axon Clinical Research
Miami, Florida, 33166, United States
-
University of Kentucky Albert B. Chandler Hospital
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536-0001, United States
-
University of Tennessee Medical Center
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37920, United States
-
Visions Clinical Research - Tucson
Tucson, Arizona, 85712, United States
-
Wake Forest Baptist Health
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157-1009, United States
-
Women & Infants Hospital (OGCC)
Providence, Rhode Island, 02905, United States
-
Women's Health Advantage
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46825, United States
-
Women's Health Alliance
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607, United States
-
Women's Health Care Group of PA
Pottstown, Pennsylvania, 19464, United States
-
Women's Health Care, PC
Newburgh, Indiana, 47630, United States
-
Women's Healthcare Associates, LLC - Tualatin
Pleasant Grove, Utah, 84062-4097, United States
-
Women's Integrated Health Care, PC
Grand Blanc, Michigan, 48439, United States
-
Wright State Physicians Health Center
Dayton, Ohio, 45405-4534, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Patch tested to block pregnancy
- Can a polymer block tubes without surgery? a trial investigates
- Can a redesigned IUD inserter make birth control safer and easier?
- Texts and local mentors: a new way to empower teen girls on contraception?
- Could a single implant replace the morning-after pill?
- New condom materials put to the test: can plastic beat latex?