Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Green vs. scalpel: which hand fracture treatment is kinder to the planet?

NCT ID NCT07521943

First seen May 10, 2026 · Last updated Jun 23, 2026 · Updated 9 times

Summary

This study looks at how much pollution and waste come from two ways of treating certain hand fractures: surgery or just letting the bone heal naturally with a splint or tape. Researchers will track 30 adults for a year, measuring things like carbon emissions and trash. The goal is to see which approach is better for the environment, without judging which is better for healing.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for METACARPAL SHAFT FRACTURES are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

  • Karolinska Institutet, Danderyd's hospital

    RECRUITING

    Stockholm, Stockholm County, 18288, Sweden

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to

If successful, this study could help guide more eco-friendly choices in hand fracture care without harming patient outcomes.

What could go wrong

This is a small observational study with only 30 participants, so results may not apply broadly. It measures environmental impact, not treatment effectiveness.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.