Which method makes emergency shoulder IV placement easiest? study tests 4 techniques.
NCT ID NCT01742780
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compared four methods for finding the correct spot in the shoulder to place an intraosseous (bone) IV, used in emergencies when regular IV access is not possible. Sixty clinicians with no prior training on this specific site tested one method each. The goal was to see which method was easiest to use, gave the most confidence, and led to the most accurate needle placement.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
60 people
The number who actually took part.
- Start date
-
Dec 2012
- Finished
-
Dec 2012
- Lead sponsor
-
A company
The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
21 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria Device Operators: * Recent/current experience in the medical field as a practicing clinician. * Currently licensed/certified Emergency Medicine Technician, paramedic, or nurse * Have had no formal training on use of the proximal humerus intraosseous insertion site. Exclusion Criteria Device Operators: There is no exclusion criteria Inclusion Criteria Healthy Volunteers * Age 21 years or older. * Has no amputation of the upper extremities. * Able to lay flat on table for up to 2 hours. * Self-reported as healthy. Exclusion Criteria Healthy Volunteers: * Have an active infection in the body * Imprisoned * Pregnant * Cognitively impaired * Fracture in humerus, or significant trauma to the site * Excessive tissue and/or absence of adequate anatomical landmarks in humerus * Infection in target area * Humeral intraosseous insertion in past 48 hours, prosthetic limb or joint or other significant orthopedic procedure in humerus * Current use of anti-coagulants
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Vascular access are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Bulverde-Spring Branch EMS
Spring Branch, Texas, 78070, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can fewer dressing changes make PICC lines safer?
- A simple ultrasound might replace invasive pressure monitoring
- Lab-Grown vessels could revolutionize dialysis access
- Could squeezing a ball make port needle changes less painful?
- Dialysis dilemma: catheter or fistula for the elderly?
- New catheter coating could cut dialysis complications