Please sign in to follow a disease.
How many pokes? study seeks optimal dry needling dose for neck pain
NCT ID NCT06149442
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Aug 19, 2026 · Updated 3 times
Summary
This study compares two doses of dry needling for chronic neck pain: five versus ten needle insertions into a trigger point. Researchers want to see which dose provides better pain relief and less disability. The trial involves 90 adults with neck pain lasting more than three months.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- dry needling (filiform needle inserted into muscle trigger points)
- What this could lead to
- If it works, this could help determine the best number of needle insertions to relieve chronic neck pain more effectively.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage study comparing two variations of the same technique. The results may not apply to all neck pain patients, and the benefit over standard care is uncertain.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
90 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Dec 2023
- Finished
-
Jun 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 70 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Nonspecific mechanical neck pain for more than 3 months. * Neck pain of at least VAS 5/10. * Reproduction of pain and symptoms subjects on palpation. * Pain on passive stretching of the muscle. Exclusion Criteria: * Subjects with previous surgical intervention. * Subjects undergoing other intervention (rehabilitation/medication). * Positive findings that raise suspicion of cervical radiculopathy: * Subjects diagnosed: degenerative arthropathies, inflammatory, systemic conditions (fibromyalgia). * Cardiovascular diseases. * Whiplash or whiplash. * Belenophobia. * Dizziness and vertigo. * Pregnant. * Thyroid disorders.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Neck pain are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Centro Investigación Fisioterapia y Dolor
Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, 28805, Spain
-
Physiotherapy and Pain Institute
Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, 28805, Spain
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a 13-Minute eye exercise routine ease screen strain?
- Can a Screen-Guided neck workout retrain muscles to ease chronic pain?
- Which neck therapy works better? a Head-to-Head test
- Can diaphragm exercises ease stubborn neck pain?
- Can deep breathing loosen the grip of neck pain?
- Does stretchy tape really soothe knotted neck muscles?