Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Can light or laser disinfection boost dental implant success in infected sockets?

NCT ID NCT07753044

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Aug 07, 2026 · Last updated Aug 07, 2026

Summary

This trial tests whether photoactivated disinfection (using a light-activated dye) or Er,Cr:YSGG laser disinfection can better clean infected tooth sockets before placing an immediate dental implant, compared to standard chlorhexidine rinsing. The goal is to see which method leads to better implant stability and bone healing. Adults with a posterior tooth needing extraction and showing signs of infection may participate. The study measures implant stability, bone density changes, and pain or swelling after the procedure.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Photoactivated disinfection (toluidine blue plus light), Er,Cr:YSGG laser disinfection, or chlorhexidine irrigation, each followed by immediate implant placement
What this could lead to
If successful, this could identify a better way to disinfect infected tooth sockets before immediate implant placement, potentially improving implant stability and bone healing.
What could go wrong
This is a small early-stage trial with only 9 participants, so results may not apply broadly. The disinfection methods may not significantly outperform chlorhexidine, and there are risks of post-operative pain, swelling, or implant failure.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

9 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Jun 2025

Finished

Feb 2026

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

20 to 60 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients having posterior tooth/teeth indicated for extraction * Patients must exhibit radiographic evidence of infection, defined as chronic periapical pathology (radiolucency) * The extraction site should have intact surrounding alveolar bone * There must be at least 2 mm of sound bone beyond the root apex * Patients must be in overall good health and free from uncontrolled systemic conditions Exclusion Criteria: * History of radiation therapy in the head and neck region * Pregnant or lactating women * Patients on long-term antibiotic therapy, as it could influence the outcomes * Heavy Smoking: More than 10-15 cigarettes per day. * Significant bruxism or parafunctional habits affecting implant stability.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Chronic periapical pathology are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Outpatient Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt

    Alexandria, Azarita, 00203, Egypt