Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

New digital tool could make eye scar assessment more accurate

NCT ID NCT07458126

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study tested a digital color scale to objectively measure scarring of the eye's surface in people with recurrent pterygium, a growth that can come back after surgery. Researchers took photos of 25 patients' eyes and used software to analyze the scar tissue. The goal was to see if this digital method is more reliable than the usual subjective exam.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this digital tool could provide a more objective and standardized way to assess scarring after pterygium surgery, improving follow-up care.
What could go wrong
This is a small, observational study with only 25 participants. The digital scale may not prove more reliable than current methods, and results may not apply to all patients.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

25 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Aug 2024

Finished

Feb 2025

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

Adult patients diagnosed with primary or recurrent pterygium evaluated at an ophthalmology clinic. Slit-lamp photographs of the anterior segment are obtained during routine clinical evaluation and analyzed using digital image analysis to quantify conjunctival vascularization and colorimetric characteristics.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Adults aged 18 years or older. * Patients diagnosed with primary or recurrent pterygium. * Availability of slit-lamp anterior segment photographs suitable for digital image analysis. * Ability to provide informed consent for participation in the study. Exclusion Criteria: * Presence of other ocular surface diseases that may interfere with conjunctival vascularization assessment. * Previous ocular surgery unrelated to pterygium that may alter conjunctival anatomy. * Poor quality slit-lamp photographs that do not allow reliable digital image analysis. * Incomplete clinical data.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Conjunctival scarring are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • ✔ Instituto de Oftalmología Fundación Conde de Valenciana IAP

    Mexico City, Mexico