Anesthesia depth may impact Long-Term survival in older surgery patients
NCT ID NCT04965324
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study follows over 6,600 elderly patients (aged 60+) who had major surgery to see if lighter anesthesia helps them live longer. The original trial found no difference in survival at one year, but this follow-up checks for effects beyond that, including on cancer recurrence and memory problems. Researchers aim to learn whether adjusting anesthesia depth can improve long-term outcomes.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
6,644 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Dec 2012
- Expected to finish
-
Aug 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
A government agency
The lead sponsor is a government body.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
All participants who were recruited to the BALANCED Trial and who met the inclusion and no exclusion criteria for analysis of the long term outcome.
- Ages
-
60 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria will be the same as the Balanced trial with participants limited to those sites described above. Survival data will be censored at date of accessing mortality database. Inclusion 1. Age over 60 years and over 2. ASA physical status 3 or 4 3. Surgery expected to last over 2 hours 4. Hospital length of stay expected to be 2 nights or more 5. General anaesthesia with or without major regional block 6. Able to monitor BIS throughout anaesthesia Exclusion 1. Unable to monitor BIS 2. Unable to consent 3. Surgery with 'wake up' test 4. Propofol infusion for part or all of maintenance of anaesthesia 5. Previous enrolment in Balanced study Exclusion The intention-to-treat (ITT) population is defined as all randomised participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria who had surgery. The per-protocol (PP) population is defined as all randomised participants in the study who meet all the inclusion/exclusion criteria for BALANCED with BIS group classified according to the actual median BIS value achieved irrespective of randomisation. Participants were allocated to the BIS=50 group if the achieved median BIS is between 45 and 55 inclusive, and to the BIS=35 group if the achieved median BIS is between 30 and 40 inclusive. Participants who are not within these ranges will be excluded from these analyses.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Cognitive dysfunction, postoperative are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Auckland City Hopsital
Auckland, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a Mushroom-Based pill cut surgery complications in colon cancer?
- Can a Longer-Lasting nerve block cut opioid use after spine surgery?
- Propofol vs. inhaled anesthesia: which one spares your recovery?
- Can a simple ointment make surgical scars heal better?
- Can a 100,000-Patient global audit reveal how to make surgery safer?
- Brain damage markers tracked during robotic prostate surgery