Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Student vs. trainee fillings: which last longer in kids?

NCT ID NCT07375706

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study looked at 200 dental fillings placed in children aged 6 to 13 by undergraduate students and postgraduate trainees. Researchers reviewed dental records and rated the fillings using standard criteria for appearance, function, and health. The goal was to see if the operator's experience level affects how long fillings last.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this study could help improve dental training by showing which skill levels produce longer-lasting fillings in children.
What could go wrong
This is a retrospective observational study, not a controlled trial, so it cannot prove cause and effect. Results may not apply to other clinics or patient groups.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

200 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Jun 2024

Finished

Feb 2025

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

The study population consisted of children aged 6 to 13 years who received posterior resin composite restorations on primary or permanent molar teeth at a university-based pediatric dentistry clinic. All included restorations were placed by undergraduate dental students or postgraduate specialty trainees as part of routine clinical care. Patients were identified retrospectively through institutional dental records, and only cases with sufficient clinical documentation and a minimum follow-up period of three months were included for evaluation.

Ages

6 to 13 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Children aged 6 to 13 years at the time of treatment * Patients who received posterior resin composite restorations on primary or permanent first or second molars * Restorations placed by undergraduate dental students or postgraduate specialty trainees in the Department of Pediatric Dentistry * Restorations with a minimum follow-up period of 3 months * Availability of complete clinical records allowing retrospective evaluation Exclusion Criteria: * Restorations placed by clinicians outside the undergraduate or postgraduate trainee groups * Restorations performed using materials other than resin composite * Restorations placed on teeth other than posterior molars * Restorations with a follow-up duration shorter than 3 months * Incomplete or missing clinical records preventing standardized evaluation

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Dental restoration failure are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Bezmialem Vakıf University

    Istanbul, Fatih, 34093, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.