New study tests which Nerve-Freezing or burning technique works best for back pain
NCT ID NCT05813639
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares two procedures—cryoablation (freezing) and radiofrequency ablation (burning)—to block nerves causing chronic low back pain. 150 adults with long-term back pain will receive one of these treatments or a different endoscopic procedure. The goal is to see which method provides better pain relief and improves daily function over 3 years.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- nerve-blocking procedures (cryoablation or radiofrequency ablation)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could point to a more effective, longer-lasting procedure for chronic low back pain from facet joints.
- What could go wrong
- This is a single study with 150 participants, and results may not apply to all back pain types. The procedures carry risks like infection or nerve damage.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
150 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Apr 2023
- Expected to finish
-
Jul 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
20 to 80 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * patients aged between 20 and 80 * positive two medial branch nerve blocks with pain relief over 80% during the first 12 hours after nerve block application * positive patient history of facet joint pain * patients with chronic low back pain for at least 6 months with back pain and leg pain (VAS \>=5) * those who (only if a signature was obtainable), or whose legal guardian, fully understood the clinical trial details and signed the informed consent form Exclusion Criteria: * patients with a history of other spinal diseases (compression fracture, spondylitis, tumor) * women with positive a pregnancy tests before the trial or who planned to become * pregnant within the following 3 years * other patients viewed as inappropriate by the staff * disagreement with participation in the study
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Back pain are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
MD, PhD, FIPP Rapcan
Bardejov, 08501, Slovakia
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can yoga ease back pain when recovery looks unlikely?
- Can a 13-Minute eye exercise routine ease screen strain?
- Can a Longer-Lasting nerve block cut opioid use after spine surgery?
- Can a gentle electric pulse ease chronic nerve pain?
- Could a Joint-Lubricant injection ease stubborn back pain?
- Rewiring the brain to fight back pain?