ER nudges boost COVID shots? trial tests simple messages
NCT ID NCT06156215
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026
Summary
This study tested whether brief videos, handouts, or a short talk from ER staff could increase COVID-19 booster vaccination within 30 days. Over 900 adults from emergency departments took part. The goal was to see if simple, low-cost messaging can improve vaccine uptake.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- vaccine messaging (videos, printed materials, face-to-face scripts)
- What this could lead to
- If effective, simple messaging in emergency rooms could help more people get COVID-19 boosters, reducing severe illness.
- What could go wrong
- This is a completed behavioral study, not a drug trial. Results may not apply to other settings or future vaccine updates.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
919 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jan 2024
- Finished
-
Aug 2024
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age \> 18 years 2. Presenting to ED 3. No receipt of COVID-19 booster within prior 6 months 4. Able to provide informed consent 5. Fluent in English or Spanish 6. Anticipated ability to complete study intervention in ED i.e., able to watch a 3-minute videoclip Exclusion Criteria: 1. Major trauma such that it will preclude survey 2. Inability to participate in a survey because of intoxication, altered mental status, or critical illness 3. Incarceration 4. Psychiatric hold 5. Patients who state that they have already received a bivalent COVID-19 booster vaccine or other COVID-19 vaccine within the prior 6 months 6. Patients who are in the ED for suspected acute COVID-19
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for COVID -19 are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
-
Duke University Hospital
Durham, North Carolina, 27708, United States
-
Jefferson Methodist Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19148, United States
-
Jefferson Torresdale Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19114, United States
-
San Francisco General Hospital Emergency Department
San Francisco, California, 94110, United States
-
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
-
University of California San Francisco Parnassus
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Home antibody tests put to the test: can you read your own COVID-19 result?
- Can lung ultrasound reveal COVID-19's signature in the lungs?
- When the immune system Can't fight back: tracking three respiratory viruses
- The household maze: how does COVID-19 move between family members?
- Can an oral drug stop COVID-19 from turning deadly?
- Can COVID-19 rapid tests slip into HIV and TB clinics without disrupting care?