Can a computer speed up breathing recovery in kids?
NCT ID NCT00678912
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested whether a computer-driven system called Smartcare/PS could help children with respiratory failure come off a breathing machine faster than usual care. Thirty children were enrolled, and the system automatically adjusted breathing support based on each child's needs. The goal was to see if this approach shortens the time to first extubation.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Smartcare/PS computer-driven weaning system
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could make weaning children off ventilators faster and more consistent, reducing time on life support.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, single-center study with only 30 children, so results may not apply broadly. The computer system may not work better than standard care.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
30 people
The number who actually took part.
- Start date
-
Sep 2007
- Finished
-
Jul 2009
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
2 to 18 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * The attending physician thinks that the patient will be able to breathe spontaneously or the patients is already breathing spontaneously. * No vasopressor or inotropic medication, unless the patient is receiving some digitalin or small doses of dopamine (\< 5 µg/kg/min) * Slight or no endotracheal tube gas-leakage (\[Vti - Vte\]/Vti ≤ 20%) * Mechanical ventilation with a plateau pressure ≤ 25 cmH2O over PEEP * PEEP ≤ 8 cmH2O * FiO2 ≤ 60% in order to obtain pulse oxymetry ≥ 95% * PaCO2 \< 70 mmHg on the last blood gases * Extubation not expected the day of inclusion Exclusion Criteria: * N/A
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Respiratory failure are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
CHU Sainte Justine
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1C5, Canada
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a portable ventilator match hospital machines? trial puts them head to head
- Can tilting a Patient's body toward the infection help them breathe free sooner?
- Can a machine breathe better than a nurse? automated oxygen system tested in COPD
- Can a battery keep ventilators running during ambulance transport?
- Can a simple ultrasound combo predict breathing failure before it happens?
- Could stepping down breathing support sooner save more lives?