Pelvic prolapse surgery showdown: which approach causes less leakage?

NCT ID NCT03200327

Terminated Disease control Sponsor: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Dec 04, 2025 · Last updated May 22, 2026 · Updated 17 times

Summary

This study compared two surgical techniques for treating pelvic organ prolapse (when organs slip out of place in the pelvis). The goal was to see if a newer vaginal approach causes less accidental urine leakage after surgery than the standard laparoscopic method. The study planned to include 55 women aged 50-80 with moderate to severe prolapse, but it was terminated early, so results are limited.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PROLAPSE GENITAL are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Contacts and locations

Show contact details

Locations

CHU Nimes

Nîmes, 30029, France
CHU de Lille

Lille, 59037, France
CHU de Montpellier

Montpellier, 34295, France
CHU de clermont-Ferrand

Clermont-Ferrand, 63003, France
Clinique Beau-Soleil

Montpellier, 34070, France
HFME - Hospices Civils de Lyon

Lyon, 69677, France

Conditions

Explore the condition pages connected to this study.

PROLAPSE GENITAL