Smaller chest cut vs. full cut: which is safer for aortic surgery?

NCT ID NCT07386028

Recruiting now Disease control Sponsor: Tomsk Cardiology Research Institute Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Summary

This study compares two ways surgeons can open the chest to repair a bulging section of the body's main artery (an aortic aneurysm). Researchers will enroll 200 patients and randomly assign them to have the repair done through either a traditional full-length chest cut or a newer, smaller J-shaped cut. The goal is to see if the smaller cut leads to fewer complications, less pain, and a faster recovery for patients.

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes NO responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ASCENDING AORTIC ANEURYSM are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Contacts and locations

Show contact details

Study contacts

Contact

Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Contact

Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia
RECRUITING

Tomsk, 634012, Russia

Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Conditions

Explore the condition pages connected to this study.

ASCENDING AORTIC ANEURYSM