Jaw fracture surgery: which approach is safer for nerves?
NCT ID NCT07403708
First seen Feb 15, 2026 · Last updated May 21, 2026 · Updated 14 times
Summary
This study compared two surgical techniques for fixing a broken lower jaw joint (subcondylar fracture). Twenty patients were randomly assigned to receive either a newer approach (transmasseteric anteroparotid) or a standard approach (retromandibular transparotid). The goal was to see which method caused fewer facial nerve injuries, less pain, and better scar satisfaction. Patients were followed for 3 months after surgery.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CONDYLAR FRACTURES are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Locations
-
Alexandria university
Alexandria, Egypt
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.