Denture attachment showdown: which works better?
NCT ID NCT07373340
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This pilot study tested two types of overdenture attachments (bar locator vs. bar ball) in 10 people with no teeth who had trouble with regular dentures. Participants were randomly assigned to one type, and their satisfaction and complications were tracked for 6 months. The goal was to see which attachment might offer better comfort and fewer problems.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- dental implant overdentures with bar locator or bar ball attachments
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could help dentists choose the best attachment type to improve denture satisfaction and reduce complications for people with no teeth.
- What could go wrong
- This is a very small pilot study with only 10 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. It only looked at short-term outcomes over 6 months.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
10 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Nov 2022
- Finished
-
Jan 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Eligibility criteria incomplete mandibular edentulism for at least one year, adequate bone volume in the interforaminal region to permit implant placement, a documented history of insufficient retention and/or stability with a conventional mandibular complete denture. Exclusion Criteria: comprised uncontrolled systemic diseases, previous radiotherapy to the head and neck region, severe parafunctional habits, and any medical or local contraindications to implant surgery. \-
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Edentulism are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Heba Wageh
Al Mansurah, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can augmented reality make dental surgery more precise?
- Could a new set of dentures sharpen an aging mind?
- Can a smartphone replace a dental scanner for implant impressions?
- Digital jaw tracking could make implant dentures fit better and feel more natural
- Dentures vs. implants: which one chews best? new study aims to find out
- Denture upgrade: adding ridges may boost satisfaction