Pig or cow? study tests which collagen dressing heals tooth holes best
NCT ID NCT05802602
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compared two collagen wound dressings—one from pigs and one from cows—placed in tooth extraction sites along with a bone graft. Nineteen non-smoking adults aged 19-65 who needed a premolar or front tooth pulled took part. Researchers measured soft tissue thickness and bone density changes to see which dressing worked better.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- porcine collagen membrane and bovine collagen wound dressing
- What this could lead to
- If one dressing works better, it could improve healing and bone quality after tooth extraction and grafting.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed study with only 19 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The dressings are already available, so no major breakthrough is expected.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
19 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Apr 2023
- Finished
-
Nov 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
19 to 65 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Non-smoking * Aged 19-65 * Requiring premolar or anterior tooth extraction and graft procedures * Good general health * Willing to provide informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * History of radiation therapy or bisphosphonate use * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * Systemic conditions that affect bone healing * Contraindications to dental implants * Inability to attend follow-up visits.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Wound heal are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Dentistry
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68503, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a placental patch help heal stubborn diabetic foot ulcers?
- Emergency wound study aims to predict which stitches will fail
- Smartphone app could let diabetic foot ulcer patients skip clinic visits for wound checks
- Gum healing boost? scientists test hyaluronic acid and polynucleotides
- Could a Placenta-Derived powder revolutionize wound healing after skin cancer surgery?
- Which heals better below the knee? stitches vs. natural healing