Should doctors call your family? study tests best way to screen for genetic risks
NCT ID NCT05348564
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares two methods of contacting family members for genetic testing after a person is found to have a gene linked to familial hypercholesterolemia or long QT syndrome. In one group, the study team directly contacts relatives; in the other, the person with the gene contacts their own family. The goal is to see which method leads to more family members getting tested and to understand the ethical and emotional impacts.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Direct contact of family members by study team vs proband-initiated contact
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that directly contacting at-risk relatives is more effective for genetic screening, potentially saving lives through early detection.
- What could go wrong
- This is an early-stage study with only 200 participants, so results may not apply to all populations. The approach may not be widely adopted due to privacy concerns.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 200 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
May 2023
- Expected to finish
-
Oct 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Proband Inclusion Criteria: * KCNQ1 Thr224Met or APOB R3527Q carrier * 18 years or older Proband Exclusion Criteria: * None Family Inclusion Criteria: * 1st degree relative of a KCNQ1 Thr224Met or APOB Arg3527Gln carrier Family Exclusion Criteria: * None
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ETHICS are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
University of Maryland Amish Research Clinic
RECRUITINGLancaster, Pennsylvania, 17602, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a treadmill test predict a Child's heart rate at play?
- A phone call could unlock early cancer detection for High-Risk groups
- Can hormones during pregnancy reshape the Heart's electrical beat?
- A new multi-test approach may spot hidden blood vessel damage before symptoms appear
- Emotional support may ease distress during cancer genetic testing
- Scripted chat before surgery boosts anesthesia awareness, study hopes