Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Which video laryngoscope works best for Double-Lumen tube insertion?

NCT ID NCT07284251

Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Inonu University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compared three devices used to place a special breathing tube (double-lumen tube) in 252 patients with normal airways undergoing lung surgery. The devices were the C-MAC D-Blade, the C-MAC Macintosh blade, and a standard direct laryngoscope. Researchers measured how long it took to insert the tube correctly. The goal was to see which device might be faster or easier for anesthesiologists to use.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this could help anesthesiologists choose the best device for faster and safer double-lumen tube placement during thoracic surgery.
What could go wrong
This is a completed observational comparison, not a treatment trial. Results may not apply to patients with difficult airways or other surgical settings.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

252 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Jun 2022

Finished

Sep 2025

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 to 75 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I to III, * Patients requiring one-lung ventilation via DLT intubation Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with a history of difficult endotracheal intubation or mask ventilation, * Patients with severe pulmonary ventilation dysfunction, * Patients with a risk of pulmonary aspiration patients

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Device performance are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Device performance

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • inonu University

    Malatya, Battalgazi, 44280, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.