Which palate expander works best? new study compares three devices
NCT ID NCT07404488
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at three different devices used to widen the upper jaw in teenagers aged 10 to 15. One device uses two small screws anchored to the bone, another uses four screws, and the third is a traditional tooth-borne expander. The goal was to see which device works best for widening the jaw and improving breathing, with 36 participants completing the study.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Palatal expander device (bone-borne or tooth-borne)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could help dentists choose the best expander for teens, leading to more effective jaw widening and fewer side effects.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed study with only 36 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The devices are already in use, so no major new treatment is expected.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
36 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Nov 2021
- Finished
-
Sep 2024
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
10 to 15 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Age 10 to 15 years (under 16 at enrollment). * Late mixed or permanent dentition. * Maxillary transverse deficiency ≥ 8 mm (unilateral or bilateral). * Parent/guardian able to provide written informed consent; participant assent where applicable. Exclusion Criteria: * Poor oral hygiene. * Prior orthodontic treatment. * Craniofacial syndromes. * Cleft lip and/or palate. * Genetic or congenital diseases likely to affect craniofacial growth or bone quality. * Inability/unwillingness to attend scheduled follow-up visits.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Orthodontic appliance are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Sapienza University of Rome
Rome, Rm, 00161, Italy
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Mouth ridge ID tested after dental expansion
- Braces and brushing: which teaching method works best for teens?
- Shock therapy for braces pain? new trial tests TENS device
- New dental device may offer simpler overbite fix for kids
- Soothing sounds: music therapy eases dental anxiety in teens
- Braces removal just got safer: new study tests gentle Clean-Up methods