Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

New heat procedure may offer better relief for chronic back pain

NCT ID NCT05409443

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early This study
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compared two heat-based procedures to treat pain from the sacroiliac joint, a common cause of low back pain. One method uses a newer device to create larger burns, while the other uses a standard technique. The trial enrolled 20 adults with long-term pain who had not improved with other treatments. The goal was to see which approach provides better pain relief and function over time.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
radiofrequency ablation (a procedure using heat to block pain nerves)
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that a newer, more extensive ablation technique provides longer-lasting pain relief for people with sacroiliac joint pain.
What could go wrong
This was a small, early-phase trial that was terminated, so results are limited. The procedure carries risks like infection, nerve damage, or temporary increased pain.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Phase 4

Runs after approval, following long-term safety and how well the treatment works in everyday use.

Participants

20 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Aug 2022

Finished

Mar 2025

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 to 90 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Adult participants aged 18-90 years old with at least 3 months of low back pain who have not responded to at least 3 months of conservative treatment. * 7-day average NPRS for low back pain of at least 4/10 at baseline * Pain relieved by at least 50% by either a fluoroscopically-guided intraarticular sacroiliac joint injection including a local anesthetic and a fluoroscopically-guided PSN block or dual fluoroscopically-guided PSN blocks. * Participants capable of understanding and providing consent in English and capable of complying with the outcome instruments used. A pain diary with appropriate diagnostic categories of relief (100% relief, 80-99% relief, etc.), will be provided. Duration of pain relief will not be used as it has been shown to only marginally improve diagnostic confidence (17). Exclusion Criteria: * History of SIJ fusion. * Prior SIJ RFA procedure * Symptomatic hip osteoarthritis * Active lumbar radicular pain * Evidence of hardware loosening (in participants with history lumbar or lumbosacral fusion). * Presence of pacemaker or neurostimulator. * Chronic widespread pain or somatoform disorder (e.g., fibromyalgia). * More than 50 mg morphine-equivalent per day opioid use. * Active bacterial infection or treatment of infection with antibiotics within the past 4 weeks. * Medical conditions causing significant functional disability (e.g., stroke, COPD). * Addictive behavior, severe clinical depression, or psychotic features. * History of anaphylactic reaction to any medication used. * Those receiving remuneration for their pain treatment (e.g., disability, worker's compensation). * Those involved in active litigation relevant to their pain. * The participant is incarcerated.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Low back pain are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Low Back Pain

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • University of Utah Farmington Health Center

    Farmington, Utah, 84025, United States

  • University of Utah Orthopaedic Center

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108, United States

  • University of Utah South Jordan Health Center

    South Jordan, Utah, 84009, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.