New heat procedure may offer better relief for chronic back pain
NCT ID NCT05409443
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compared two heat-based procedures to treat pain from the sacroiliac joint, a common cause of low back pain. One method uses a newer device to create larger burns, while the other uses a standard technique. The trial enrolled 20 adults with long-term pain who had not improved with other treatments. The goal was to see which approach provides better pain relief and function over time.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- radiofrequency ablation (a procedure using heat to block pain nerves)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that a newer, more extensive ablation technique provides longer-lasting pain relief for people with sacroiliac joint pain.
- What could go wrong
- This was a small, early-phase trial that was terminated, so results are limited. The procedure carries risks like infection, nerve damage, or temporary increased pain.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 4
Runs after approval, following long-term safety and how well the treatment works in everyday use.
- Participants
-
20 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Aug 2022
- Finished
-
Mar 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 90 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Adult participants aged 18-90 years old with at least 3 months of low back pain who have not responded to at least 3 months of conservative treatment. * 7-day average NPRS for low back pain of at least 4/10 at baseline * Pain relieved by at least 50% by either a fluoroscopically-guided intraarticular sacroiliac joint injection including a local anesthetic and a fluoroscopically-guided PSN block or dual fluoroscopically-guided PSN blocks. * Participants capable of understanding and providing consent in English and capable of complying with the outcome instruments used. A pain diary with appropriate diagnostic categories of relief (100% relief, 80-99% relief, etc.), will be provided. Duration of pain relief will not be used as it has been shown to only marginally improve diagnostic confidence (17). Exclusion Criteria: * History of SIJ fusion. * Prior SIJ RFA procedure * Symptomatic hip osteoarthritis * Active lumbar radicular pain * Evidence of hardware loosening (in participants with history lumbar or lumbosacral fusion). * Presence of pacemaker or neurostimulator. * Chronic widespread pain or somatoform disorder (e.g., fibromyalgia). * More than 50 mg morphine-equivalent per day opioid use. * Active bacterial infection or treatment of infection with antibiotics within the past 4 weeks. * Medical conditions causing significant functional disability (e.g., stroke, COPD). * Addictive behavior, severe clinical depression, or psychotic features. * History of anaphylactic reaction to any medication used. * Those receiving remuneration for their pain treatment (e.g., disability, worker's compensation). * Those involved in active litigation relevant to their pain. * The participant is incarcerated.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Low back pain are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
University of Utah Farmington Health Center
Farmington, Utah, 84025, United States
-
University of Utah Orthopaedic Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108, United States
-
University of Utah South Jordan Health Center
South Jordan, Utah, 84009, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Pilates takes on standard physical therapy in battle against Work-Related back pain
- Radiofrequency device tested as Add-On for stubborn back pain
- Back muscles hold clues for treating recurrent low back pain
- Skip the GP? physiotherapy first for back pain put to the test
- Can yoga ease back pain when recovery looks unlikely?
- Can a second injection target the source of stubborn back pain?