Charcoal toothbrush showdown: can it beat regular brushes for cleaner teeth?
NCT ID NCT07563413
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested whether charcoal-infused toothbrushes remove plaque and stains better than regular nylon toothbrushes. Thirty-six Egyptian adults brushed twice daily for 4 weeks with standard toothpaste. Plaque and stain levels were measured at the start and end. The goal is to see if the charcoal brush offers any real advantage for everyday oral hygiene.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- charcoal-infused toothbrush
- What this could lead to
- If it works, this could show that charcoal toothbrushes are a better option for daily plaque and stain control.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, short-term study (36 people, 4 weeks) with no blinding, so results may not apply widely or last long-term.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
36 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jan 2026
- Finished
-
Feb 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
21 to 50 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Subjects who will be given a consent to participate in the study, between 21 to 50 years old, with an original plaque score recorded above 2, and presence of at least twenty long lasting natural teeth (excluding wisdom tooth, teeth with orthodontic appliances) were included in the study. Exclusion Criteria: * Subjects with any physical constraints that might prevent normal oral hygiene procedures, history of sensitivity to toothpaste, use of interdental aids (interdental floss, mouth rinses, etc), pregnant or breastfeeding females, subjects under medication such as anti inflammatory, antiepileptic and antihypertensive, medically compromised patients (systemic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, etc), evidences of gingival or periodontal diseases or trauma at baseline, any lesion of hard and soft tissue, were excluded from the study.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Dental plaque are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Faculty of Dentistry Cairo University
Cairo, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a Protein-Packed toothpaste outperform fluoride alone?
- Which mouthwash fights plaque better: chlorhexidine or essential oils?
- Can a special toothpaste tame gum disease?
- Electric flosser may tackle plaque and gum bleeding better than brushing alone
- Can an electric flosser outperform a manual toothbrush for healthier gums?
- Could games and peer support transform orphan dental care?