Keyhole surgery blood loss study compares tying techniques
NCT ID NCT06875518
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at 60 women aged 35 to 60 who had a hysterectomy (removal of the uterus) through small cuts in the belly (laparoscopy). The goal was to compare two different methods of tying off the uterine arteries to see which one led to less blood loss during surgery. The results help doctors choose the safest technique for patients with heavy bleeding or uterine problems like fibroids.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
60 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Mar 2025
- Finished
-
Jun 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
35 to 60 years
- Sex
-
Female participants only
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients aged between 35-60 years Patients presented with menometrorrhagia unresponsive to medical treatment, and uterine pathology such as adenomyosis or multiple fibroids. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients were excluded if they had: medical conditions preventing pneumo-peritoneum * Patients with medical conditions hindering proper ventilation during general anesthesia. * Patients diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma and patients with uterine size larger than 24 weeks were excluded. * Patients with excessive adhesions precluding access to the uterine arteries were not enrolled in the study.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Adenomyosis are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Mostafa Bahaa
Damietta, New Damietta, 34518, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can big data improve safety in gynecologic surgery?
- Could a simple surgical step make hysterectomies safer?
- Can a Double-Wall bag stop leaks during keyhole fibroid surgery?
- Could talking directly to teens before surgery ease their pain?
- Could skipping bowel prep make surgery easier on patients?
- Can watching videos before surgery calm nerves?