Dust mite allergy test gets a tune-up in new study
NCT ID NCT07195929
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study aims to find the best concentration of Blomia tropicalis (a type of dust mite) extract for allergy skin testing. About 30 adults with known dust mite allergies will receive small pricks with different extract strengths to see which causes a reaction similar to a standard histamine control. The goal is to improve the accuracy of allergy diagnosis for this common allergen.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 30 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Nov 2025
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Jan 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
A company
The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 64 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Female or male aged 18 to 64 years, both included. 2. Subjects who have signed and dated the informed consent form. 3. Subjects must reside in a geographical area where allergic problems caused by Blomia tropicalis are relevant. 4. Positive medical history of inhalant allergy (rhinitis and/or rhinoconjunctivitis and/or asthma) to Blomia tropicalis 5. A positive prick-test (mean wheal diameter ≥ 3 mm) with an extract of the same allergen and/or presence of specific IgE against complete extract or any molecular component to the allergenic source. 6. The area of the wheal obtained with 10 mg/mL histamine dihydrochloride should be ≥ 7 mm², which corresponds to a mean wheal diameter ≥ 3 mm. 7. The area of the wheal obtained with negative control should be \< 7 mm², which corresponds to a mean wheal diameter \< 3 mm. 8. Women of childbearing age (i.e following menarche and until postmenopause, defined as no menses for 12 months without an alternative medical cause, or non-subject to permanent sterilization methods, such as hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral oophorectomy) must present a negative urine pregnancy test at the time of enrollment in the trial, as well as a confirmed menstrual period. 9. Women of childbearing age must commit to using a highly effective and adequate contraception method during the trial and up to 72 hours after the end of treatment with the investigational medicinal product. Such methods include combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal; contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, intravaginal or transdermal), progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, injectable or implantable), intrauterine device (IUD), intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS), bilateral tubal occlusion, vasectomized partner or sexual abstinence. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Subjects outside the age range. 2. Subjects who have previously received immunotherapy within the last 5 years for the treatment of asthma or allergic rhinoconjunctivitis induced by allergens that may interfere with Blomia tropicalis extract. 3. Subjects with significant symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis and/or bronchial asthma in whom discontinuation of systemic antihistamine treatment is contraindicated. 4. Subjects who have previously exhibited a severe adverse reaction during diagnostic skin prick tests. 5. Subjects on treatment with ß-blockers. 6. Use of drugs that could interfere with skin prick test reactions (e.g., antihistamines) (See Section 5.2). 7. Clinically unstable subjects (acute asthma, febrile, etc.). 8. Subjects with active urticaria lesions, severe active dermographism, severe atopic dermatitis, sunburn, eczema, psoriasis lesions in the area where the prick test is performed (risk of false positives). 9. Subjects with active herpes simplex viral infection, or herpes varicella zoster in the area where the prick test is performed. 10. Subjects with any pathology in which the administration of adrenaline is contraindicated (hyperthyroidism, hypertension, heart disease, etc.). 11. States in which the subject is unable to offer cooperation and severe psychiatric disorders. 12. Pregnant or potentially pregnant women and breastfeeding women. 13. Subjects with known phenol allergy.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Allergic asthma are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Hospital Universitario de Canarias
San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, 38320, Spain
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a needle in the face tame allergy symptoms?
- Can AI make acupuncture more precise for allergy relief?
- Can your genes predict wood smoke harm?
- Ancient herbal blend put to the test against hay fever
- Can a pinpoint pollen dose unmask allergy triggers?
- Can an antihistamine–steroid combo pill beat standard allergy meds?