Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Bionic vs myoelectric hands: which works better for amputees?

NCT ID NCT07347561

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Sep 11, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two types of artificial hands—bionic and myoelectric—for people who have lost an arm below the shoulder. Researchers want to see which hand helps with daily tasks, how users feel about their body image, and how satisfied they are. About 20 adults who have used a prosthetic hand for at least 6 months will take surveys to share their experiences.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

20 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Nov 2025

Finished

Mar 2026

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

The study included individuals aged 8-65 who had undergone upper limb amputation.

Ages

18 to 65 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Aged 18 to 65 years * Individuals with unilateral upper limb amputation * Regular use of a prosthetic device for at least 6 months * Use of a semi-electronic elbow joint prosthetic component * Ability to understand and complete study assessments Exclusion Criteria: * Presence of bilateral or multiple limb amputations * Proximal upper limb amputation at the shoulder level or above * Coexisting neurological or orthopedic disorders that may affect upper limb function or study outcomes

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Amputation are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • University of Health Sciences Gülhane Faculty of Health Sciences

    Ankara, Keçiören, 06010, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.