Please sign in to follow a disease.
Pacemaker trick may reveal who needs fluids after heart surgery
NCT ID NCT07730242
First seen Jul 28, 2026 · Last updated Jul 29, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study tests whether a simple pacing routine using a temporary pacemaker wire can help predict which patients need extra fluids after heart surgery. Researchers will gradually increase and then decrease the heart rate while measuring stroke volume changes. The goal is to see if these changes can identify fluid responsiveness before giving a standard fluid bolus.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- atrial pacing protocol via surgically placed pacemaker wire
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this approach could give doctors a quick, non-invasive way to tell whether a patient needs more fluids after heart surgery.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early observational study with only 18 participants. The pacing protocol may not reliably predict fluid needs in all patients.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 18 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Jan 2027
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Jan 2029
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Aged 18 years or older. * Underwent CABG surgery, without concomitant valve surgery. * Admitted to the ICU during the first postoperative day. * Equipped with surgically placed temporary atrial pacemaker wire. * Scheduled for a 500 mL bolus of balanced solution (Ringer's lactate) within the first two postoperative hours for clinical reasons. * Able to provide preoperative consent at the outpatient clinic before the surgery takes place. * Assessed by the attending intensivist as hemodynamically stable and (thereby) eligible for the study. Exclusion Criteria: * Presence of atrial fibrillation or other arrhythmias precluding atrial pacing. * Absence of atrial pacemaker wire. * Suspected cardiac tamponade or significant postoperative bleeding (e.g., \>400 mL blood loss in the first hour postoperatively). * Use of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) during the observation period. * Acute changes in vasopressor or inotrope dosage within the observation period. * Significant changes in body position, ventilator settings, or pacing mode during the study protocol. * Known contraindications to echocardiographic monitoring or arterial wave form analysis.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Evaluate whether beat-to-beat ramped atrial pacing is related to fluid responsiveness in postcardiac surgery patients are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.