Spinal vs. general anesthesia: which protects leg tissue better during surgery?
NCT ID NCT07474480
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This completed study looked at 60 adults having leg surgery with a tourniquet to see if spinal or general anesthesia better maintains blood flow in the leg. Researchers used a light-based sensor to measure tissue oxygen levels. The goal was to understand which method might reduce injury from reduced blood flow.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
60 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Mar 2025
- Finished
-
Dec 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Adults aged 18 to 65 years with ASA physical status I-II who were scheduled for elective lower extremity orthopedic surgery with tourniquet use at Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital between 01 March 2025 and 30 September 2025. Eligible patients were assessed consecutively and enrolled after providing informed consent. Patients were analyzed in 2 observational cohorts according to anesthesia method used in routine clinical practice: general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia.
- Ages
-
18 to 65 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Age 18 to 65 years * Scheduled for elective lower extremity orthopedic surgery * ASA physical status I or II * Expected operation duration 30 to 120 minutes * Expected tourniquet duration 30 to 90 minutes * Informed about the anesthesia method and agreed to participate voluntarily * No contraindication to neuraxial block Exclusion Criteria: * Refusal to participate * History of peripheral arterial disease, diabetic neuropathy, or advanced vascular insufficiency * Severe or uncontrolled systemic disease, including ASA III or higher * Coagulopathy, local infection, or contraindication to spinal anesthesia * Body mass index greater than 35 kg/m² * Pregnancy or impaired consciousness * Intraoperative hemodynamic instability or anticipated instability * Need for additional intraoperative sedative or analgesic medication * Inability to obtain adequate and reliable NIRS signal for technical reasons
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for General anesthesia are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Cemil Tasciogu Research and Training Hospital
Istanbul, Sisli, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Muscle relaxant dose may hold key to better breathing tube alternative
- The 3 AM intubation: does fatigue make airway management more dangerous?
- Which blood pressure drug protects organs better during spine surgery?
- Can a rough sound reveal how deep anesthesia goes?
- Can a targeted nerve block cut opioid use in High-Risk C-Sections?
- Can a new sedative make anesthesia safer for seniors?