New filling material tested against standard for Gum-Line cavities
NCT ID NCT06673888
First seen Apr 02, 2026 · Last updated Jun 23, 2026 · Updated 8 times
Summary
This study tested two different tooth-colored filling materials for cavities that form near the gum line (Class V cavities). Fifty adults received either an alkasite-based resin composite or a resin modified glass ionomer filling. Dentists checked the fillings right away, after 6 months, and after 1 year to see how well they stayed in place and looked. The goal was to see if the newer material works as well as the standard one.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CLASS V DENTAL CARIES are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Locations
-
Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
Cairo, Egypt
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
Active substance
dental filling materials (alkasite-based resin composite and resin modified glass ionomer)
What this could lead to
If one material performs better, dentists may have a more durable option for filling cavities near the gum line.
What could go wrong
This is a small, short-term study (50 people, 1 year). Longer follow-up and larger studies are needed to confirm any advantage.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.