Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

AI vs. anesthesiologists: who scores better on Pre-Op risk?

NCT ID NCT07407998

First seen Feb 15, 2026 · Last updated Jun 23, 2026 · Updated 20 times

Summary

This study tested whether artificial intelligence models can correctly assign a standard surgical risk score (ASA Physical Status) to patients before surgery. Researchers compared AI-generated scores to those given by experienced anesthesiologists in 128 adult patients. The goal was to see if AI could help support preoperative risk assessment.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PREOPERATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Bursa City Hospital

    Bursa, Nilüfer, 16110, Turkey (Türkiye)

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to

If successful, this could show that AI can help doctors quickly and consistently assess patient health before surgery, potentially improving efficiency and reducing human error.

What could go wrong

This is a small, completed observational study, not a treatment trial. AI may not match the accuracy of experienced anesthesiologists, and results may not apply to all hospitals or patient groups.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.