Could skipping chemo be safer for early rectal cancer?
NCT ID NCT07669298
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This trial tests whether close follow-up (active surveillance) is as good as chemoradiotherapy for preventing cancer return after early-stage rectal cancer removal. About 480 adults with intermediate-risk T1 rectal cancer will be randomly assigned to either regular checkups and scans for 5 years or a 5-week course of radiation plus chemotherapy. The goal is to see if surveillance causes fewer serious side effects while keeping cancer outcomes similar.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Active surveillance (regular checkups and scans) vs chemoradiotherapy (radiation plus capecitabine or 5-FU chemotherapy)
- What this could lead to
- If active surveillance works as well as chemoradiotherapy, patients with early rectal cancer could avoid harsh treatments and their side effects, while still staying safe from cancer recurrence.
- What could go wrong
- This is a mid-stage trial with 480 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Active surveillance might miss cancer regrowth, and chemoradiotherapy has known risks like bowel problems or severe side effects.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 480 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Jun 2026
- Expected to finish
-
Jun 2037
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Pathologically confirmed rectal cancer located extraperitoneally. 2. Complete tumour resection (R0) by means of ESD or IMD (endoscopic or TAMIS). 3. Pathological report indicative of: \- pT1 with at least 1 of the following features: poor histological differentiation (grade 3), vascular invasion, lymphatic invasion, high tumour budding (grade 2-3), sm2 or sm3 invasion. 4. Endoscopic images or video of the tumour before local excision. 5. Maximum cancer diameter ≤ 30 mm based on the pathological assessment. 6. cN0 stage based on pelvic MRI; lymph nodes smaller than 10 mm will be considered as benign, independent of morphologic features. Staging must be performed within 6 weeks before randomisation. \- If enlarged lymph nodes are present on MRI performed after ESD/IMD (raising the possibility of reactive inflammatory change), fine needle aspiration (FNA) will be undertaken, and patients with negative FNA cytology will remain eligible. 7. Adequate distant staging (thoracic and abdominal CT) without signs of distant metastasis (cM0). 8. Have undergone a high-quality full colonoscopy: * Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score equal or greater than 2 in all colonic segments. * Documented caecal intubation. * All polyps ≥20 mm in diameter other than the index lesion must be completely removed and assessed pathologically. 9. Expected survival time of more than 12 months from randomisation. 10. At least 18 years old at the time of informed consent. 11. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0, 1 or 2. 12. Adequate hematologic function, based upon meeting the following laboratory criteria within 7 days before randomisation: * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 × 10\^9/L. * Haemoglobin (Hb) ≥ 8.0 g/dL (red blood cell transfusions are allowed to reach the target level). * Platelet count ≥ 75 × 10\^9/L. 13. Adequate liver function, based upon meeting the following criteria within 7 days before randomisation: * Serum albumin ≥ 3.0 g/dL. * Total bilirubin (in serum) ≤ 2.0 mg/dL. * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≤ 3 × the upper limit of normal (ULN). * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 3× ULN. * Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≤ 3 × ULN. 14. Adequate coagulation defined by International Normalized Ratio (INR) ≤ 2.0 within 7 days before randomisation. 15. Adequate renal function, based upon meeting the following laboratory criteria within 7 days before randomisation: * Serum creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula. * Absence of significant proteinuria. If the subject is found to have dipstick test indicative of proteinuria equal or larger than 2+, or lab urinalysis for protein is greater than or equal to 1 g/L, the subject must demonstrate urine protein \< 1 g/24 h to be eligible. 16. Recovery from prior treatment-related toxicities to \< Grade 2 severity per CTCAE v6.0, unless the adverse events are clinically nonsignificant and/or stable on supportive therapy. 17. Sexually active fertile subjects and their partners must agree to use medically accepted methods of contraception (e.g., barrier methods, including male condom, female condom, or diaphragm with spermicidal gel) during the study treatment. This does not apply to postmenopausal women (amenorrhoeic for at least 12 consecutive months), women aged above 55, or surgically sterilized patients (men and women). 18. Female participants of childbearing potential must not be lactating or pregnant, with a negative beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG) test (blood or urine) at screening and before the first dose of the study treatment. Females of childbearing potential are defined as premenopausal females capable of becoming pregnant (i.e., females who have had any evidence of menses in the past 12 months, except for those who had prior hysterectomy). However, women who have been amenorrhoeic for 12 or more months are still considered to be of childbearing potential if the amenorrhea is possibly due to prior chemotherapy, antioestrogens, ovarian suppression, low body weight, or other reasons. 19. Written informed consent to participate in the study provided before randomisation. 20. Capability of understanding and complying with the protocol requirements. 21. Absence of any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule; those conditions should be discussed with the patient before registration in the trial. 22. Eligibility for thoracic, abdominal and pelvic CT and MRI. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Suspicion of distant metastases on computed tomography of the abdomen or thorax or lymph node involvement (lymph nodes \>9mm in short axis); In case of isolated enlarged nodes biopsy will be required before exclusion. 2. Mesorectal tumour involvement on pelvic MRI. 3. Synchronous colorectal cancer in screening colonoscopy. 4. Known genetic cancer syndrome, including, but not limited to adenomatous or serrated polyposis syndrome; Lynch or Lynch-like syndrome. 5. Known inflammatory bowel disease. 6. Previously identified allergy or hypersensitivity to 5-FU or capecitabine. 7. Known or suspected dihydropyridine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency. 8. Prior receipt of pelvic radiation. 9. Other contraindications to pelvic irradiation. 10. Serious illness other than cancer that would preclude safe participation in the study 11. Uncontrolled and significant condition, including, but not limited to, the following conditions: * Heart failure NYHA II or above. * Major cardiac arrhythmia. * Myocardial infarction within 6 months before randomisation. * Unstable angina pectoris. * Stroke (including transient ischemic attack, TIA) within 6 months before randomisation. * Thromboembolism within 3 months before randomisation. * History of hypertensive crisis. 12. Gastrointestinal disorders associated with a high risk of perforation or fistula formation. 13. Gastrointestinal bleeding event within 28 days of randomisation. 14. Major surgery performed within 4 weeks prior to randomisation or scheduled for surgery during the study period. Complete healing from major surgery must have occurred 1 month before randomisation. Complete healing from minor surgery must have occurred at least 7 days before randomisation. 15. Serious non-healing wound or bone fracture. 16. Malabsorption syndrome. 17. Pregnancy or lactation. 18. Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H).
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Rectal cancer are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
3 sites in 2 countries. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Institute of Oncology in Warsaw
RECRUITINGWarsaw, Poland
-
University Clinical Centre
RECRUITINGGdansk, 80210, Poland
-
University Hospital, Limoges
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGLimoges, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Robotic surgery vs standard approaches: does the platform change cancer outcomes?
- Can two immunotherapy drugs help rectal cancer patients skip pelvic radiation?
- Can digital surveys capture the full toll of rectal cancer treatment?
- Can a targeted drug conjugate outsmart advanced colorectal cancer?
- Can a platform trial match the right drug combo to each tumor?
- Laser light may help surgeons spot risky bowel connections