Ultrasound showdown: which method best confirms breathing tube placement?
NCT ID NCT06656546
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested three different ultrasound techniques to see how well they confirm that a breathing tube is in the right place (windpipe vs. food pipe) in 200 emergency patients. Doctors compared these methods to standard checks like carbon dioxide monitoring and listening to the chest. The goal was to find the fastest and most accurate way to ensure patient safety during emergency intubations.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for INTUBATION; DIFFICULT OR FAILED are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, 34687, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- AI predicts tough intubations: could save lives in surgery
- New study tests STOP-BANG questionnaire to predict airway trouble in obese surgery patients
- Two heads better than one for breathing tube insertion?
- Which blade size works best for intubation? large study seeks answers
- Head-Up position may ease tube insertion in simulated difficult airway
- Your face shape might predict anesthesia risks, study says