Which drug cuts C-Section bleeding best? tranexamic acid vs misoprostol put to the test
NCT ID NCT07712510
First seen Jul 17, 2026 · Last updated Jul 17, 2026
Summary
This trial compares two medicines—intravenous tranexamic acid and rectal misoprostol—for reducing blood loss in women having a planned cesarean section. About 214 women will be randomly assigned to receive one of the drugs before surgery. Researchers will measure blood loss during and two hours after the procedure, as well as changes in hemoglobin levels, to see which treatment is more effective.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- intravenous tranexamic acid or rectal misoprostol
- What this could lead to
- If one medicine works better, it could become the standard choice to reduce bleeding and prevent anemia after cesarean sections.
- What could go wrong
- This is a single-hospital study with 214 participants, so results may not apply to all women. Both drugs have side effects, and the trial does not track long-term outcomes.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 4
Runs after approval, following long-term safety and how well the treatment works in everyday use.
- Participants
-
214 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Mar 2025
- Finished
-
Aug 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
20 to 45 years
- Sex
-
Female participants only
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * 37 to 42 weeks of gestation * Planned cesarean section Exclusion Criteria: * Women with pre-eclampsia * Chronic hypertension * Multiple pregnancies * Preterm or postdate pregnancy * Previous cesarean section * Gestational diabetes * Fetal macrosomia * History of bleeding / clotting disorder * On anti-coagulation heparin / warfarin therapy * Non-reassuring cardiotocograph or poor progress of labor
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Blood loss, postoperative are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Medicare Hospital (Pvt) Limited
Multan, Punjab Province, 60000, Pakistan
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Effectiveness of health educational program for primigravida women in reducing the rate of unnecessary cesarean section
- Two common drugs face off to shield mothers from a dangerous drop in blood pressure
- Can simple recovery checklists after cesarean boost patient well-being?
- Can we predict severe pain after C-Section?
- Can a slower oxytocin infusion prevent dangerous blood pressure drops in C-Sections?
- Can an AI chatbot calm nerves before a C-Section as well as a doctor?