Recycled teeth vs. blood plasma: which saves jawbone better?
NCT ID NCT07239193
Summary
This study compares two materials used to preserve jawbone after a back tooth is pulled. One material is made from the patient's own extracted tooth, while the other mixes a standard bone substitute with the patient's blood plasma. Researchers will measure which material better maintains bone width and height over four months in 24 adult patients.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes NO responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ALVEOLAR RIDGE PRESERVATION are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University - Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Cairo, 12613, Egypt
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.