Wrist vs groin: which is safer for heart valve patients?
NCT ID NCT06284837
Summary
This study aims to determine whether accessing an artery in the wrist (radial) is safer than accessing one in the groin (femoral) during a minimally invasive heart valve replacement procedure called TAVI. Researchers will enroll 542 patients who need a TAVI to treat a severely narrowed aortic valve. They will randomly assign patients to have their secondary access point be either the wrist or groin artery and compare rates of bleeding and other complications.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes NO responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for VALVE STENOSES, AORTIC are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Study contacts
-
Contact
Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Locations
-
Alfred Health
RECRUITINGMelbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia
Contact
Contact
Contact Email: •••••@•••••
-
Cabrini Health
RECRUITINGMelbourne, Victoria, 3144, Australia
Contact
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
-
Epworth Healthcare
RECRUITINGMelbourne, Victoria, 3121, Australia
Contact
Contact Email: •••••@•••••
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.